A Simplistic Approach for Registration of Orthogonal Planar Images as a Pre-Preparation for Externally Acquired Cranial Images in Department of Radiation Oncology, Nayati Healthcare and Research Centre
Sujit Nath Sinha, Santanu Chaudhuri, Somnath Dey "A Simplistic Approach for Registration of Orthogonal Planar Images as a Pre-Preparation for Externally Acquired Cranial Images in Department of Radiation Oncology, Nayati Healthcare and Research Centre". International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology (IJCTT) V29(1):55-59, November 2015. ISSN:2231-2803. www.ijcttjournal.org. Published by Seventh Sense Research Group.
Abstract -
Accurate image registration for CT-CT,
CT-MRI for brain is necessary to obtain clinical
information from diagnostic images and translate the
information to radiotherapy treatment planning CT
images.
Mostly in cases of Post-Surgery cases that have been
operated outside hospitals and are being referred for
Post-Operative adjuvant Radiotherapy to our Centre,
where the pre-operative volume is very importantly
necessary in radiotherapy planning, a pre preparation
was needed.
The intention of the work is two folds. One is to make
the outside clinic diagnostic images with rectangular
matrix dimension compatible with our treatment
planning system (TPS), Eclipse version 11. Second use
point by point registration in three orthogonal planes
as pre-preparation process for specific outside clinic
diagnostic images where registration accuracy was
not the intention. Both the intentions were handled
using in-house developed software in Matlab and the
saved registered images were transferred to TPS for
auto matching the images for fine tune. Visual
inspection of the registration was in good agreement.
The mean variation for the dimension of the
registered phantom images from the Base image of
the phantom were found to be 0.5 mm which was less
than 1 pixel value.
References
[1] L. Lemieux, N. D. Kitchen, S. W. Hughes, and D. G. T.
Thomas. Voxel-based localization in frame-based and
frameless stereotaxy and its accuracy. Medical physics,
21(8):1301–1310, 1994.
[2] L. Lemieux and R. Jagoe. Effect of fiducial marker
localization on stereotactic target coordinate calculation in
CT slices and radiographs. Physics in medicine and biology,
39:1915–1928, 1994.
[3] K. P. Gall and L. J. Verhey. Computer-assisted positioning
of radiotherapy patients using implanted radioopaque
fiducials. Medical physics, 20(4):1152–1159, 1993.
[4] K. Leung Lam, R. K. ten Haken, D. L. McShan, and A. F.
Thornton. Automated determination of patient setup errors in
radiation therapy using spherical radio-opaque markers.
Medical physics, 20(4):1145–1152, 1993.
[5] S. Li, C. A. Pelizzari, and G. T. Y. Chen. Unfolding patient
motion with biplane radiographs. Medical physics,
21(9):1427–1433, 1994.
[6] R. T. Malison, E. G. Miller, R. Greene, G. McCarthy, D. S.
Charney, and R. B. Innis. Computer-assisted coregistration
of multislice SPECT and MR brain images by fixed external
fiducials. Journal of computer assisted tomography,
17(6):952–960, 1993.
[7] M. Y. Wang, J. M. Fitzpatrick, C. R. Maurer, and R. J.
Maciunas. An automatic technique for localizing externally
attached markers in MR and CT volume images of the head.
In M. H. Loew, editor, Medical imaging: image processing,
volume 2167, pages 214–224, Bellingham, WA, 1994. SPIE
Press.
[8] T. Greitz, M. Bergstrom, J. Boethius, D. Kingsley, and T.
Ribbe. Head fixation system for integration of
radiodiagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Neuroradiology,
19:1–6, 1980.
[9] L. V. Laitinen, B. Liliequist, M. Fagerlund, and A. T.
Eriksson. An adapter for computer tomography guided
stereotaxis. Surgical neurology, 23:559–566, 1985.
[10] L. R. Schad, R. Boesecke, W. Schlegel, G. H. Hartmann, G.
H. Sturm, L. G. Strauss, et al. Three dimensional image
correlation of CT, MR, and PET studies in radiotherapy
treatment of brain tumors. Computer assisted tomography,
11:948–954, 1987.
[11] J. Bijhold. Three-dimensional verification of patient
placement during radiotherapy using portal images. Medical
physics, 20(2):347–356, 1993.
[12] G. X. Ding, S. Shalev, and G. Gluchev. A ? - ? technique
for treatment verification in radiotherapy and its clinical
applications. Medical physics, 20(4):1135– 1143, 1993.
[13] P. Neelin, J. Crossman, D. J. Hawkes, Y. Ma, and A. C.
Evans. Validation of an MRI/PET landmark registration
method using 3D simulated PET images and point
simulations. Computerized medical imaging and graphics,
17(4/5):351–356, 1993.
[14] J. Moseley and P. Munro. A semiautomatic method for
registration of portal images. Medical physics, 21(4):551–
558, 1994.
[15] B. J. McParland and J. C. Kumaradas. Digital portal image
registration by sequential anatomical matchpoint and image
correlations for real-time continuous field alignment
verification. Medical physics, 22(7):1063–1075, 1995.
[16] Kenneth Ulin, Marcia M Urie and Joel M Cherlow. Results of
a multi-Institutional benchmark test for cranial CT/MR
image registration. Int. J. Radiation Oncology Biol. Phys.,
Vol. 77, No. 5, pp. 1584–1589, 2010
[17] Sindhu Madhuri G. Classification of Image Registration
Techniques and Algorithms in Digital Image Processing– A
Research Survey International Journal of Computer Trends
and Technology– Volume 15 number2–Sep2014
[18] R.V.Prasad CH, S.Suresh. A Comprehensive Image
Segmentation Approach for Image registration, International
Journal of Computer Trends and Technology- volume 3 Issue
4- 2012
[19] Arya Ghosh, Himadri Nath Moulick, Susmit Karmokar.
Biomedical Image Segmentation and Registration Using
Type-2 Fuzzy Logic, International Journal of Computer
Trends and Technology – volume 4 Issue 5– May 2013
[20] C.Kavitha, Prathiba.S, Antony Judice.A. Modified Tumour
Cut Algorithms For MRI Image Segmentation of Brain
Tumours. International Journal of Computer Trends and
Technology – volume 4 Issue 6 –June 2013
Keywords
CT-CT, CT-MRI, manual fusion, RT
Planning, treatment planning system (TPS), Base
image, Input image, Matlab.