Effectiveness of Fuzzy Logic Multiple Attribute Decision Making Approach in Six Sigma Methodology in Software Industry |
||
 |
 |
|
| © 2020 by IJCTT Journal | ||
| Volume-68 Issue-1 |
||
| Year of Publication : 2020 | ||
| Authors : Kavyashree N, Dr.Supriya M C | ||
| DOI : 10.14445/22312803/IJCTT-V68I1P112 | ||
How to Cite?
Kavyashree N, Dr.Supriya M C, "Effectiveness of Fuzzy Logic Multiple Attribute Decision Making Approach in Six Sigma Methodology in Software Industry," International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 52-57, 2020. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/22312803/IJCTT-V68I1P101
Abstract
Six sigma is a methodology for enhancing software development system and functional greatness in a software industry. Decision on serious variables choosing in software analysis steps are frequently very critical it place a fundamental aim in proper implementation of six sigma software projects, software productivity improvement in software industry. In software environment involves the inexact, software uncertainty and vague software data. From a case study direction; this article demonstrates a planned approach for choosing of software serious factor of software development breakdown section (failure in software project) at a software company using six sigma methodology and fuzzy logic techniques faced Multi properties decision making model. the above steps we have taking six criteria attribute for choosing of software serious factor for software development breakdown. In this section average time before software failure, is considered to be key identifying criteria. In this article we have computed the weights related to criteria through different techniques such as fuzzy logic TOPSIS method, fuzzy logic VIKOR method, AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) approach etc. Software serious factor for breakdown ranking or prioritizing. Our outcomes are very powerful accordance with the perception of software production and software maintenance selection of the software industry.
Keywords
Fuzzy Logic, Six Sigma Methodology, Software Breakdown Criteria, Multiple Attribute Decision Making, Software Industry.
Reference
[1] Chandrakanth G Pujari and Dr. Seetharam K., “An Evaluation of Effectiveness of the Software Projects Developed Through Six Sigma Methodology”, American Journal of Mathematical and Management Sciences, 34(1) · January 2015-16
[2] Chandrakanth G Pujari and Dr. Seetharam K.,” Top Priority of Software Success Factor for Six Sigma Execution by a Fuzzy Hierarchical Process”, International Journal of Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering 9 (11), 171-180, 2014-15
[3] Chandrakanth G Pujari and Dr. Seetharam K.,”Evaluation for Defective Density in All the Right Places”, Indian journal of engineering, 2014, 11(26), 30-37
[4] Chandrakanth G Pujari and Dr. Seetharam K.”Ranking of Tools use, software logical complexity, Requirement volatility, Quality requirements, Efficiency requirements in software development”, 2009 IEEE International Advance Computing Conference, DOI: 10.1109/IADCC.2009.4809258,Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 31 March 2009
[5] Chandrakanth G Pujari, “Software Information Flexibility for Lean Six sigma Software Development Using Multiple Regression Analysis”, Indian Journal of Engineering, 2017, 14(36), 95-107
[6] Chandrakanth G Pujari, Dr.SeetharamK,”Investigating the Effects of Factors on Software Development”, International Journal of Computer Applications, vol. 1, issue 6, pp. 56-65, February 2010, 10.5120/142-261
[7] Chandrakanth G Pujari and Dr. SeetharamK.,Article: “Estimation of Growth Parameters for a Software Development”. International Journal of Computer Applications 35(12):38-42, December 2011.
[8] Chandrakanth G Pujari, Kavyashree N, Dr.Supriya M C”Enhancement of Indian Software Quality Management Using Multi Criteria Objects and Six Sigma Methodology”, International Journal on Future Revolution in Computer Science & Communication Engineering ISSN: 2454-4248 Volume: 4 Issue: 4 806 – 81 2019
[9] Chandrakanth G Pujari, Dr. SeetharamK ,”Detection and valuation of major error trends of software projects using pareto principle and fuzzy model”, National journal on advances in computing & Management, vol 3 no. 2 october 2012.
[10] Chandrakanth G Pujari, Kavyashree N, Dr.Supriya M C, “Development of a Methodology for Software Small and Medium Scale Industries in the Selection of Suitable Lean Six Sigma Tools”, JASC: Journal of Applied Science and Computations Volume VI, Issue II, February/2019 ISSN NO: 1076-5131
[11] Chandrakanth G Pujari and Dr. Seetharam K, “Software Defects Identification Using Principles of Data Gathering and Pareto Analysis” ,DOI: 10.5176/2251-2217_SEA12.36, 2012
[12] Chandrakanth G Pujari and Dr. Seetharam K,” Software Defects Identification Using Principles of Data Gathering and Pareto Analysis”, DOI: 10.5176/2251-2217_SEA12.36 2012
[13] Chandrakanth G Pujari , “Modeling Software Project Defects With Fuzzy Logic Maps”, International Journal on Future Revolution in Computer Science & Communication Engineering ISSN: 2454-4248 Volume: 4 Issue: 4 103 – 107, IJFRCSCE | April 2018, Available @ http://www.ijfrcsce.org
[14] Chandrakanth G Pujari and Dr. Seetharam K,” Implementation of Multivariate Clustering Methods for Software Development” https://www.bvicam.ac.in/news/INDIACom%202010%20Pr oceedings/papers/Group3/INDIACom10_122_abstract%20( 5).pdf
[15] Buglione, L., Trudel, S. (2010), “Guideline for sizing Agile projects with COSMIC”, In: Proceedings of the IWSM / MetriKon / Mensura 2010, Stuttgart, Germany
[16] Bhasin, S. (2011), “Performance of organizations treating lean as an ideology”, Business Process Management Journal, Vol. 17 No. 6, pp. 986-1011.
[17] Bergmiller, G.G. and McCright, P.R. (2009), “Parallel models for lean and green operations”, paper presented at Industrial Engineering Research Conference, Miami, FL.
[18] Furlan, A., Vinelli, A. and Dal Pont, G. (2011), “Complementory and lean manufacturing bundles: an empirical analysis”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 31 No. 8, pp. 835-850.
[19] George, M. ed. (2010), “The Lean Six Sigma Guide to Doing More with Less cost”, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ
[20] Stone, K.B. (2012), “Four decades of lean: a systematic literature review”, International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 112-132.
[21] Vinodh, S. and Balaji, S. (2011), “Fuzzy logic based Leanness assessment and its decision support system”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 49, pp. 40-67.
[22] Zhang, Q., bbas, J., Zhu, X. and Shah, M. (2012), “Critical success factors for successful Lean Six Sigma implementation in Pakistan”, Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 117- 124.
[23] S.M. Kazemi, (16-18 July 2012). Six Sigma project selection by using a fuzzy multiple criteria decision making approach a case study in poly acryl corp. CIE42 proceedings, Cape Town, South Africa 2012 CIE & SAIIE.
[24] Snee, Ronald: Leading Six Sigma: A Step-by-Step Guide Based on Experience with GE and Other Six Sigma Companies, Financial Times Prentice Hall 2002
[25] Stone, K.B. (2012), “Four decades of lean: a systematic literature review”, International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 112-132.
[26] Vinodh, S. and Balaji, S. (2011), “Fuzzy logic based Leanness assessment and its decision support system”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 49, pp. 40-67.
[27] Furlan, A., Vinelli, A. and Dal Pont, G. (2011), “Complementory and lean manufacturing bundles: an empiricalanalysis”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 31 No. 8, pp. 835-850.
[28] Maroofi, F. and Dehghan, S. (2012), “Performing lean manufacturing system in small and medium enterprises”,International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Vol. 2 No. 3 pp. 156-163.
[29] Nordin, N., Deros, B.M. and AbdWahab, D. (2012), “A framework for managing change in lean manufacturing implementation”, International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 101-117.
[30] Stone, K.B. (2012), “Four decades of lean: a systematic literature review”, International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 112-132.