Cost-Performance Evaluation of General Compute Instances: AWS, Azure, GCP, and OCI |
||
|
|
|
© 2024 by IJCTT Journal | ||
Volume-72 Issue-11 |
||
Year of Publication : 2024 | ||
Authors : Jay Tharwani, Arnab Purkayastha | ||
DOI : 10.14445/22312803/IJCTT-V72I11P127 |
How to Cite?
Jay Tharwani, Arnab Purkayastha, "Cost-Performance Evaluation of General Compute Instances: AWS, Azure, GCP, and OCI," International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology, vol. 72, no. 11, pp. 248-255, 2024. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/22312803/IJCTT-V72I11P127
Abstract
Cloud computing has become the cornerstone of modern IT infrastructure, offering a wide range of general-purpose instances optimized for diverse workloads. This paper compares the cost and performance of general-purpose compute instances across four major cloud providers: AWS, Azure, Google Cloud Platform (GCP), and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI). Using standardized configurations of 4 vCPUs and 16 GiB of RAM, the study evaluates instances based on processor architecture (Intel, AMD, ARM), pricing models, and performance benchmarks. Key findings reveal that ARM-based instances deliver superior price-performance ratios for cost-sensitive workloads, while Intel-based instances excel in enterprise-grade applications requiring versatility and reliability. The results aim to guide organizations in selecting the most cost-effective and performance-efficient cloud resources for their specific needs.
Keywords
Cloud computing, Cost-performance analysis, General purpose instances, Processor architectures, Virtual machines.
Reference
[1] Amazon Web Services, AWS Pricing. [Online]. Available: https://aws.amazon.com/pricing/
[2] Microsoft Azure, Azure Pricing Calculator. [Online]. Available: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/
[3] Google Cloud Platform, Google Cloud Pricing. [Online]. Available: https://cloud.google.com/pricing/
[4] Oracle Cloud Infrastructure, OCI Pricing and Services. [Online]. Available: https://www.oracle.com/cloud/pricing/
[5] Geekbench, Processor Performance Benchmarks. [Online]. Available: https://browser.geekbench.com/
[6] A. Jassy, Introducing AWS Graviton3 Processors, AWS Blog. [Online]. Available: https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/introducing-aws graviton3-processors/
[7] Microsoft Azure, Dv5 Sizes Series, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/virtual-machines/dv5-dsv5-series
[8] Google Cloud, Machine Families Resource and Comparison Guide. [Online]. Available: https://cloud.google.com/compute/docs/machine types
[9] Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Documentation, Compute Shapes. [Online]. Available: https://docs.oracle.com/en-us/iaas/Content/Compute/References/computeshapes.htm
[10] Phoronix, Amazon EC2 M6i Performance for Intel Ice Lake in the Cloud Benchmarks, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.phoronix.com/review/ec2-m6i-icelake
[11] Amazon EC2 m6a.Large. [Online]. Available: https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/21610849
[12] Microsoft Azure, Dpsv5 Sizes Series. [Online]. Available: https://docs.microsoft.com/azure/virtual-machines/dpsv5-dpdsv5-series
[13] Google Cloud, CPU Platforms. [Online]. Available: https://cloud.google.com/compute/docs/cpu-platforms
[14] OCI, Compute Shapes. [Online]. Available: https://docs.oracle.com/en-us/iaas/Content/Compute/References/computeshapes.htm#vm standard
[15] Geekbench6. [Online]. Available: Geekbench 6 - Cross-Platform Benchmark
[16] Cloud Market Share. [Online]. Available” https://siliconangle.com/2024/11/16/cloud-market-share-shows-vendors-eyeing-1t-opportunity
[17] Oracle Announces Fiscal 2025 First Quarter Financial Results. [Online]. Available” https://investor.oracle.com/investor-news/news details/2024/Oracle-Announces-Fiscal-2025-First-Quarter-Financial-Results/default.aspx
[18] Future Looks Good for Oracle on Back of Cloud and AI: Times. [Online]. Available: https://www.thetimes.com/business money/markets/article/future-looks-good-for-oracle-on-back-of-cloud-and-ai-8q78nvdtt
[19] Synergy, Cloud Market Growth Stays Strong in Q2 While Amazon, Google and Oracle Nudge Higher, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.srgresearch.com/articles/cloud-market-growth-stays-strong-in-q2-while-amazon-google-and-oracle-nudge-higher
[20] Xinghan Chen et al., “X86 vs. ARM64: An Investigation of Factors Influencing Serverless Performance,” Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Serverless Computing, pp. 7-12, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[21] S. Vignesh Bharadwaj, and Chetan Kumar Vudadha, “Evaluation of x86 and ARM Architectures using Compute-Intensive Workloads,” 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Smart Electronic Systems (iSES), Warangal, India, pp. 586-589, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[22] Vasco Nuno Caio dos Santos, “RISC vs. CISC – The Post-RISC,” University of Minho, pp. 105-112, 2024.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[23] Sebastian Kmiec et al., “A Comparison of ARM Against x86 for Distributed Machine Learning Workloads,” Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking for the Analytics Era, pp. 164-184, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[24] On Power Efficiency: x86 vs. ARM, pp. 1-28, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://indico.cern.ch/event/1128343/contributions/4787174/attachments/2412950/4129612/PowA_GridPP47.pdf
[25] Rafael Vidal Aroca, and Luiz Marcos Garcia Gonçalves, “Towards Green Data Centers: A Comparison of x86 and ARM Architectures Power Efficiency,” Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, vol. 72, no. 12, pp. 1770-1780, 2012.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[26] Emily Blem, Jaikrishnan Menon, and Karthikeyan Sankaralingam, “Power Struggles: Revisiting the RISC vs. CISC Debate on Contemporary ARM and x86 Architectures,” 2013 IEEE 19th International Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA), 2013.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]