AI and the Personalization-Privacy Paradox: Balancing Customized Marketing with Consumer Data Protection
  IJCTT-book-cover
 		          
 
© 2024 by IJCTT Journal
Volume-72 Issue-9
Year of Publication : 2024
Authors : Vishvesh Soni
DOI :  10.14445/22312803/IJCTT-V72I9P105

How to Cite?

Vishvesh Soni, "AI and the Personalization-Privacy Paradox: Balancing Customized Marketing with Consumer Data Protection," International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology, vol. 72, no. 9, pp. 24-31, 2024. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/22312803/IJCTT-V72I9P105

Abstract
This study explores the dual challenge of leveraging Artificial Intelligence (AI) to personalize marketing efforts while safeguarding consumer data privacy. The aim is to understand the balance between effective customized marketing and robust data protection practices. Employing a mixed-method approach, the research combines quantitative surveys to gather consumer perspectives on privacy and personalization with qualitative interviews of marketing professionals to understand industry practices and challenges. Data analysis involves statistical techniques for the survey data and thematic analysis for the interview data. The results show a significant conflict between what customers want—customized experiences—and what they worry about—data privacy. Consumers appreciate the convenience and relevance of customized marketing but express apprehension about data misuse and the need for more transparency. On the industry side, marketers acknowledge the importance of data protection but need help implementing effective privacy measures without compromising personalization quality. The study highlights the necessity for a balanced approach that addresses consumer privacy concerns while maintaining the benefits of personalized marketing. Recommendations include adopting transparent data practices, enhancing consumer control over personal data, and developing regulatory frameworks supporting privacy and innovation.

Keywords
AI, Consumer data protection, Customized marketing, Personalization, Privacy.

Reference

[1] Helen Nissenbaum, Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life, Journal of Information Policy, vol. 1, pp. 149-151, 2011.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[2] Tamara Dinev, and Paul Hart, “An Extended Privacy Calculus Model for E-Commerce Transactions,” Information Systems Research, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 61-80, 2006.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[3] Earl R. Babbie, The Practice of Social Research, Cengage Learning, pp. 1- 575, 2020.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[4] Kristi Jackson, Pat Bazeley, and Patricia Bazeley, Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo, 3rd ed., SAGE Publications, pp. 1-376, 2019.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[5] Virginia Braun, and Victoria Clarke, “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology,” Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77-101, 2006.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[6] John W. Creswell, and Vicki L. Plano Clark, Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, SAGE Publications, pp. 1-520, 2017.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[7] Andy Field, Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics, SAGE Publications, pp. 1-1144, 2024.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[8] Steinar Kvale, Doing Interviews, SAGE Publications, pp. 1-160, 2012.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[9] Michael Quinn Patton, Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice, SAGE Publications, pp. 1-832, 2014.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[10] Irving Seidman, Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education and the Social Sciences, 3 rd ed., Teachers College Press, pp. 1-162, 2006.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[11] R. Likert, “A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes,” American Psychological Association, vol. 22, no. 140, pp. 1-55, 1932.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[12] Punit Chahar, 6 Strategies to Navigate the Personalization-Privacy Paradox, 2023. Online. [Available]: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/6-strategies-navigate-personalization-privacy-paradox-punit-chahar
13] Reuben Binns et al., “'It's Reducing a Human Being to a Percentage': Perceptions of Justice in Algorithmic Decisions,” CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montreal QC Canada, pp. 1-14, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[14] Juliana Sutanto et al., “Addressing the Personalization-Privacy Paradox: Improving Relevance Through Transparency and Customization,” Management Information Systems Research Center, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 1141-1164, 2013.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]